This will be the Front-Page, showing in brief the Contents an d Choices
=========================================================================================
this page
Welcome to Life-Refreshment
will become the first sort of "chapter", being written by all participants.
It's present wideky various entries will soon be 'sorted' and moved to appropriately-named further pages,"chapters",
"pamphlets", "books", or "manuals".
=========================================================================================
I'm sure I submitted a post to http:lordsoftheblog.net under Baroness Deech's "Secrecy" post, and it was published but has since been removed;
0400Sunday111211.
================
1810pmTh081211. Am starting the www.minorityofone.net non-profit egalitarianly-social & democratic citizens website;
and will then be able to start a proper front-page on this Lifefresh one, and tidy up from then on.
---------------------------
0515Th081211
Baroness Murphy's Post "The Strike" - milesjsd (versus) Twm O'r Nant.)
-------------------
0843GMT Sunday 04 December 2011
Please note that this non-profit 'llifefresh minority-of-one' website is being linked to the Google-websites, and soon to
voluntary community websites', initially administered by
yours faithfully John Sydney Denton Miles
and hoping to find out how to get Create-net to add facilitation for you to post your comments back to these voluntary non-profit
and honestly-responsible free-speech democratic e-sites.
====================================================================
gmt0835W30November2011
http://lordsoftheblog.net is currently publishing submissions by milesjsd as a part of a new UK Democratic-Inclusion intention;
please visit, and join-in if you like.
please visit and join-in - tell of your 'one-ness'.
Meanwhile, this 'one' is busy - what's that joke-on-an-apron, "I am never busy - I always get it right first time !" ? - Sunday 4th December today
======================================================================================================
27 Oct 2011 Whilst Baroness Deech has published my 'not-understandable' comment to her "The cost of hacking" topic,
the Hansard moderator has blocked and deleted my integrally-second comment thereto.
I have applied for 'leave to raise this matter democratically'; but since the British democratic System can not be trusted
to publish, in the interim I am attempting to publish the whole train here and on www.75l25w.com (my individual non-profit
democratic citizens websites):
=========================================
previously
Welcome again ! at 1015a.m. Wednesday 26 October 2011 - this time Lord Soley is blocking my submission concerning
our Future vis a vis being in or retreating out of the EU:
(submitted at 7.30 a.m. approx this morning) and promoting instead the later Lord Blagger's (after 0800 a.m. today)
We have no idea where my submission is being held, or who it may have been 'insider-leaked' to; so until it is published
To “Govt divisions on the EU” by Lord Soley
from milesjsd
Whilst I think, and have long been saying and reasoning, that not just Lord Soley nor all Politicians and Governance workers
including the
Judiciary and Civil-Service,
but effectively all of Us, have been falling dangerously far behind the changing Purpose of human-civilisation and of Earth’s
Lifesupports thereto-
– so it is difficult for me to say “Lord Soley has got something right here” -
namely that within a European-Union (note perhaps, and thereby within a Currency Sino-European, and a North-Atlantic
Defence, ‘bloc’ also)
now-little Britain stands a much better chance of both economic and militarily-political survival and thrival,
i.e. than we would stand by withdrawing from the EU and in a real sense thereby ‘retreating-in-disorder’ behind a lone
Sterling and a
not-too-robustly-healthy-and-numbers-strong Nation and NationStates) struggling ‘Identity’.
———-
So I ask:
Why can Britain not face-up-to the state-of-the-planet ?
and perhaps be the first to re-write an Order, of both Purpose and civilisational-sustainworthiness,
and in any event make haste to save ourselves by creating the first small-communities living sustainworthily ?
other nations’ are probably already trying to ‘pioneer’ such communities, so we shall be not only within a sub-consortium
of nations, in the EU and so forth, but within
the paradigm-updating United Nations, of the whole world ?
And thereby we shall be showing real and positively-co-constructive world-leadership and transparent-example, not
merely towards the survival of the whole
World’s Lifesupports, but majorly towards the longest-possible-term thrival of the Human Race and of we British People
therewithin ?
(<250words)
Posted here and on www.75l25w.com 1030 a.m. and 1045a.m. (approx) today.
===============================================
previously
Welcome ! 0950 F14) - only me here, busy in the 'backroom', will be posting more soon. Wishing you freshness of Life.
0800 Monday 10 Oct 2011
Being "fit for purpose" is a big necessity, especially you would think for such high institutions as the UK House of Lords
and the Judiciary.
Once again, however, these very costly and onerous Constitutional Institutions are showing that they are not fit for
longest-term Purpose;
and thereby are not shaping up democratically fit for short-term purposes.
who without good reason
is suppressing the following serious citizen's contribution:
Workplaces and training thereto need to be clearly and safely distinguished from lifeplaces and education thereto.
Neither the women & children ‘s purpose & workplace(-cum-creche-lifeplace),
nor the mens’;
nor indeed this and the next Earth’s purpose and lifesupports;
are going to ‘work’ sustainworthily until the following kinds of issue are both tackled and win-win-win resolved,
and I would suggest they be tackled immediately and independently on the one hand by all Peoples, on the one hand,
and by all Experts:.
Carefully distinguish, describe, and define:
(1) short-term and longest-term Strategic Purpose, and thereunder medium-term sub-strategic and tactical purposes
(of every civilisational sector);
(2) individual and ('versus') collective human development;
(2) training-for-workplace and ('versus') education-for- lifeplace;
(3) worker-efficiency and vs lifeplace-human efficiency;
(4) “earning”, “taking”, “being-paid”, “being- given”, and vs “being-’bribed’;
(5) sustainability and vs sustainworthiness;;
(6) “mental ill-health” and vs “mind-functional good-health”
(Please see also Baroness Murphy’s current post “Eat less” (Diet):
(7) a ‘balanced’ and an ‘imbalanced and/or ‘imbalancing’ diet & lifestyle.
(8) Natural-Lifesupportiveness and human-civilisational-lifesupportivenesses adequacies and inadequacies
(e.g. the already seriously advanced depletion of micronutrients from most of the agricultural and horticultural soils
of the Earth);
================================
(9) … … …
(A near-neighbour having asked me to add
“And that’s probably just for starters”,
I would submit that such clarification be continued by ongoing public discussion and scrutiny. JSDM).
Baroness Murphy has published milesjsd's separate submission to her post about "Eat well eat less"
including therein a time and space-saving specific referral to milesjsd's above submission which Baroness Deech is
suppressing.
Come on then, who needs to know, in this "full democracy" self-appointedly claimed by Britain ? (see publications
by Lord Soley and others).
============================ 0847 Monday 10 )ct 2011.
0245Sunday11Sep (trying to improve this presentation) Welcome 2121Friday09Sep2011
An Alternative Health therapy, namely a sensitive and highly-skilled full-body holistic massage, by a 3-years trained
and registered "complementary" or "naturopathic" practitioner, such as in Shiatsu or the deeper Rolfing, is a full 60
minutes long and reliably priced at £30.
It is not only more generally satisfying than a rushed 'penis-only' "hand-job" given by an unskilled, clock-watching,
"robot production line labourer" charging £40 cash in advance for a mere 10 minutes (that's £10 more cash
but the non-qualified, non-registered "professional" (if you ever heard anything so traditionally-historically stupidly daft)
has provided only one sixth of a healthily-remedial timeframe, and has been dominantly limited, limiting, and negativising,
and has charged 'murderously'. Such "sex industry" is the insidious opposite of being further-educational, life-enriching,
Focally, religions have a sacred duty to protect and nurture the innate and developmentally-successive seven sacramental
For a good and sober description of the sevenfold-spirit and its physiological and mind-function connections, see
“Anatomy of the Spirit” (Caroline Myss);
“Lifestreams” (David Boadella);
and Other works upon The 7 Sacraments, the 7 Chakras, the 7 Human Energy Centres, such as Maya Fiennes's
serialised practical guidance through
"Kundalini Yoga" on "Body-in-Balance" Sky channel 275.
In the case of the many Christian churches, none of them holistically nurtures the innate seven sacramental energy-centres,
interrelatingly between Body, Emotions, Mind-Functions, Environmental-Influences. Spirit, Individual-sanctuary, and
needs.
Neither is there any other institution providing such basic protection and nurturing.
Neither does the NHS and its Psychiatric arm have specific protection and positive nurturance for these 7 innate
Sex is inborn throughout and connectively between, the seven human energy centres;
so to try to separate it from the other energies within that sevenfold-whole is in a real sense a disfiguration and a
Facilitators, educators, and legislators dealing with this “Legalising Brothels” issue need to seriously scrutinise
Welcome 0220AM.Wednesday 07September2011.
From the British House of Lords
so-called "democratic contact with the People" e-site
and from the anti-democratic and strategic-reasoning-avoidant Baroness Deech's blogging
currently dragging its feet through the one-eyednesses of the UK Governance establishment and Its Camp-Followers:
"Scottish tuition fees"
The 'no bull' Baroness Deech is so scared of real democratic engagement, truth, and rational strategic reasoning,
that she needs to make Hansard suppress and not publish relevant contributions from milesjsd (my submissions)
So here is one, to be going along with (while I try to catch up on sleep)
Firstly, the Training-System, now having come to mean Schools and Universities as well as Technical and Business
Colleges,
feeds The Workplace with workers on a life-span and civilised-constitution basis;
but that Workplace is here for the sole purpose of supporting and making sustainworthy BOTH Earth’s Natural
lifesupports AND
Humankind’s Civilised 75% Lifeplace therein.
Since The Workplace, its profits, governance, and workforces are owned by The Employers, then all training for
work should be
paid for by The Employers;
i.e. school and university costs are properly the Debt of Workplaces and therefore of The Employers who own
and control
both workplaces, the workers therein, and trainee-workers (pupils & students);
NOT by the Taxpayer, nor by the trainee-workers (namely as Students) nor by students’ Parents.
The 'no bull' Baroness Deech thinks the above Issue has nothing whatever to do with her Tuition Fees
revolving-door.
=============================================================================
Tune in for further suppressed democratic submissions, now on a weekly basis !
Previously:
Welcome to Life Refreshment 0950W13July11
Please go direct to
>>>> "watch this space" below
------------------------------------------------
The story so far:
the Lords of the Blog e-site appears to be a "promising" step forward towards participatory-democratisation.
However, whilst The People certainly are "underskilled", "under-enabled", and "under-empowered" to perform
between Elections as people-upwards democratic-governance contributors and scrutinisers,
the Peers are seriously behind-the-times with their knowledge, know-how and people's-advocacy skills &
performance-abilities.
Twelve hours ago I submitted a contribution to Baroness Murphy's post about "Legal Highs" (on drugs); but it is
being "sat-on"; so here is the first part of it:
"One Primary Point, sub-divisible into three, concerning "harm versus good", and "material/money & coss/savings
'versus' human & health quantification and qualification".
1. We the Public need to be given "Differentiation Lists" (here with drugs/diets; but also elsewhere with methodology
such as between "Directive and Participative" Bodies such as democracvy, boardroom, neighbourhood-clubs,
family-group self-management)
clearly distinguishing "Public Good" from "Public Harm".
(to be continued if not soon released from 'quarantine' and published by Lords of the Blog)
1921W13July
-------------------------------
1235Tue12July11. Baroness Deech has allowed this website address to appear
in her corner of control over Lords of the Blog;
however, she continues to fail to recognise and to discuss the citizen's contributed comment, because she "prefers"
to win-every-argument by abusing Logic;
she still says "I prefer intelligible comment to the point, so as not to put off other commentators with something
relevant to say".
My reply to that is being 'sat-on', not democratically published, by the Lords of the Blog;
therefore if not published there, it will very soon have to appear here - unless someone can show me a better
democratic-sharing e-site for such matters
(Incidentally. Wikileak also gives such people-=participation matters the cold-shoulder.
They too are in fact among the super-rich, profiteering and living in wasteful luxury off many more human-livings
than any one human-being needs and is by Nature entitled to.
-------------------------------------------------
>>>> "watch this space" no-one has shown me a better democratic e-site, so
here is one of the replies I submitted, which Baroness Deech suppresses (again and again I'm afraid):
"Baroness Deech has again chosen to go public with the foulplay of attacking a constyructive-citizen-contributor as being
"unintelligible",
"not to the point", "having nothing relevant to say".
Anyone interested in honest versus dishonest reasoning will be greatly helped by Tindale's "Fallacies and Argument Appraisal"
wherein he,
a truly noble author unlike some of the Peers on Lords of the Blog, explains the Fallacy of Persona Attack (page 81):
"In the wide public domain, where controversial issues are debated and personalities invariably clash, the strategy of
ATTACKING AN OPPONENT because of some real or 'perceived' characteristic, circumstance, or association is
particularly
prevalent"
p89 "Critical Questions: 1. Has an attack been made on another person in an argument debate ?".
Yes; more than twice by Baroness Deech, against JSDMiles especially against his submitted contributions.
"2. Has that attack focused upon the person's character or circumstance and avoided any discussion of his/her argument ?"
Yes; by Baroness Deech persistently avoiding charitable recognition and honest discussion of JSDMiles's submissions.
It would appear that Baroness Deech "prefers" to follow 'I win - You lose' cheat-cards gleaned from such a cheap source as
Madsen
Pirie's
"How To Win Every Argument -by abusing logic", than to take up the more moral and thoughtfully-studied honest disciplines
set out by Christopher Tindale.
That having been clearly said, there could be one saving grace on the side of the Lords of the Blog, namely that some
Moderator
(possibly in Hansard but probably in this instgance the Baroness herself) has published one of my submissions but then
instead of
ditching it, has tried to publicly dismiss it, out nof hand (which can still come across as "Deeching it").
Let's face it (folks), some other Peers whilst publishing one's submissions therafter total ignore those parts, usually major
points,
that they
find
uncomfortable or unsupportive to their own often loopholey topics and argumentation, or both.
Although the baroness's ostensible reason for rejection rests simply up[on her own personal "preference' rather than upon
democratic-ethics,
he has at least appeared to allow the wider readership the chance to check-out what she has suppressed, by visiting the
submissor's Not-for-profit,
lone-democratic-citizen's information-sharing website via www.lifefresh.co.uk .
0053T12July2011.JSDM."
================================================================
I have today Wednesday 13th july further just submitted a short reply, to B.Deech's "I prefer intelligible.." reply, as follows:
" I notice that Baroness Deech has not published my reply to her individual preference for "intelligent comments to the point
(because other commentators are easily put off when they do actually have something relevant to say)"
so in the meanwhile it may be read via my non-profit, lone-democratic-citizen's website www.lifefresh.co.uk .
0845W13.JSDM.
=================================================================
Watch this space
-----------------------------------
Previously:
Saturday 09 July 2011
The following serious democratic-citizen's contribution was submitted to http://lordsoftheblog.net ,
to Baroness Deech's request for comments upon "Media Morality"
but has been suppressed, 'censored',;
removed without an adequately justifiable explanation;
but any serious-minded person and any child-in-learning has a right and a possible-need
to be allowed to read it and to form their own evaluation of it.
(Note; the author JSDM has clarified and updated a few parts; but the original intended-messgae is the same).
"Morality" has to be the overarching absolute Truth upon 'what limits and guidelines should & need to be enforceably entrenched
within Governance's constitutions, legislations, regulations,
processes & budgetgings'.
Moral Law stems from the best think-tank minds, namely those of PhD levels in both Moral-Reasoning and Formal-Argumentation -
or should stem therefrom.
From that Moral-Law are secondarily developed the various "Ethics", of the various Professions and Sectors-of-civilisation,
and of the Nation-State and of its Nation (namely its Peoples, for their Workplce and Lifeplace behaviours respectively).
However, since moral-reasoning and formal-argumentation have been 'wet-blanketed' into an obscurity by The Establishment ,and
by alll sectors of Governance, Academia, Education, Religion, and Community, 'ditched' in favour of Expert-Directives, Competitive
Winner-Takes-All "Debating", and interminably-tomed and protracted "histories" of individual philosophers,
and of their Schools-of-"Thought", posing as Philosophy;
and furthermore since the dominant-ethic of all "civilised-morality & economics" allows and blindly requires there to be Harvested
One-and-a-Half-Earths-worth of human-lifesupports, just to maintain the present 7 billion world-population as it today unsatisfactorily
stands and suffers, which is not only morally and ethically un-sustain-worthy, but practically un-sustainable too;
there is no longer any such useful thing, in any of the eleven or so civilisations around the world today, as "Morality";
and even further more, the heading to this blog, "Media Morality" is out-of-order, since the Media is only a subordinate sector
under overarching Moral-Law;
so thus is only required and entitled to construct its own Media-Ethics.
Matters of Morality are determined and written much higher up than any of the Sectors, including here The Media sector and its
current alleged-criminals The News of the World and the Murdoch dynasty.
originally posted -225F080711 by JSDM.
(**) Note that the ongoing Media malfeasance is a complicity one, in supporting the political and economic strategy requiring
there to be
Three (3) Earths-worth of human-lifesupports consumed by global-economics by 2050, when the world-population is planned
and set to reach 11 billion people;
and Governments and the Media tell us, and seem to have capitulatively accepted that, "there is nothing we can do about it".
JSDM 1504Saturday 090711.
==================================
0536St040611
(Present and correct: but please let this site be, for the time being,
it is a 'mess' but it's individual contents are and 'always will be' of vital usefulness to the world's
variously-placed peoples,
thank you).
John Sydney Denton Miles.
============================
re Our human-race Predicaments: Pomp, Ceremony, USA-President visit to
UK 27May20110200 270511
the following submitted to The Lords of the Blog on http://lordsoftheblog.net ; but removed
by them from the public eye:
" The Predicaments remain, getting insidiously worse, however;
(whilst London splashes-out on expensive Governmentral-Self-Praisings)
but whatever the new-and-;ongstanding Earth-Emergency-Rationing-Rationale is going to be,
I feel sure about our
continuing and frequent Need, to show such History and surviving good-and-honest talk and
demonstration
as has been prepared and is being presented around Britain these current few days, to be affordably-
necessary.
Are the peacefujl revolutionaries, and the cost-conscious watchdogs as prepared ?
And will the BBC be (as prepared); - in time to be effectve ?
If the Public Archives are not sufficiently stocked with Recordings and Copies of such proceedings and
morale-lifters,
to be whisked out and very low-cost broadcast to both Nation and World
(because the last thing the Predicaments need is 'L:ive Show' Expenses)
then by that defacto I am no citizen
certainly not the claimed 'democratic' and 'rule-of-law' one pageanted yesterday;
and not even of God's Good Earth. JSDM. "
=======================================
This space awaiting further copy.
re Crossbenching and governance-corruption
viz 4 Questions
1. What lifesupports are Welfare entitlements meant to "buy" ?
2. How can the citizen monitor and calculate such ?
3. What life-models, economic-theories, and reasonings are these founded upon ?
4. What other factors might be taken into consideration ?
Easter Sunday 24 April 2011
I am simply copying the Friendly Method III to http://www.life75job25.com .
Last Week:
World Governance Insanities.
There are four main contributory reasons for thinking, not just The United Nations, but
All other International unions,
the EU and Britain therein,
subsidiary Organisations and Communities,
and governmentall-empowered people and individuals
to be intractably and collectively Insane
and duplicitly Destructive of all Life on Earth
including the self-extinction of our own Human Race :
1) Their absence of ability and willingness to support positively collective human development i.e. to measure
and govern national bodies by Workplace ecolo-nomical and Lifeplace-efficient Sustainworthiness.
2) Their absence of ability and willingness to adopt, promote, and affordably-implement Individual Human
Development advances; such as Body-Mind-Centering, Perceptual Self-Control, NLP, Friendly Method III Needs
& Affordable-Hows Listing and Win-Win-Win Cooperative Problem Solving, and Six modes of constructively
cooperative thinking, planning, and action-ing.
3) Their overkilling and extincting of the Earth's living and renewable lifesupports, and over-destruction of Earth's
non-living and non-renewable resources.
4) Their repression, and suppression, of Human Effectivities, throughout both World Governments, Economic and
Ecological Authorities, Education Authorities, Communities of People and of Religions, and throughout Medical &
Psychiatric Authorities and Services.
There can be no worse Insanity than that of Psychiatry itself,
and of all Governance, Educational,
and Resources-Management Authorities themselves,
to be unable and unwilling to come up-to-date, keep theirselves up-to-date,
and majorly keep all Peoples up-to-date.
Posted 0730 Sunday 17 April 2011; via Create.net on website www.75l25j.com .
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Previously.
Website host John Miles has been busy elsewhere since Sunday26Sep2010'
From May2010 he has been making contributions to an e-site run by some of the sitting members of the
UK Upper House of Parliament, called "Lords of the Blog" address http://lordsoftheblog.net .
John appears there as milesjsd, and signs himself off his formal or serious submissions a JSDM, and from his
informal or ligjhthearted contributions as jsdm.
Some current contributions will appear here, in intendedly inside a light-green box -
but Create has changed this 'Box' and 'Edit box' facility such that I can no longer custom a box nor its details.
So here goes trying pasting-in a copy from http:lordsoftheblog.net "Libya -by Lord Soley with its first few
comments including milesjsd 's:
------------xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-----
But from this point, older posts will be moved along onto other appropriate pages.